ZDNET’s key takeaways
- OpenAI’s new GPT-5 flagship failed half of my programming exams.
- Earlier OpenAI releases have had nearly good outcomes.
- Now that OpenAI has enabled fallbacks to different LLMs, there are alternatives.
So GPT-5 happened. It is out. It is launched. It is the discuss of the digital city. And it is obtained some issues. I am not gonna bury the lede. GPT-5 has failed half of my programming tests. That is the worst that OpenAI’s flagship LLM has ever performed on my rigorously designed exams.
Additionally: The best AI for coding in 2025 (and what not to use)
Earlier than I get into the main points, let’s take a second to debate one different little function that is additionally a bit wonky. Try the brand new Edit button on the highest of the code dumps it generates.
Clicking the Edit button takes you into a pleasant little code editor. Right here, I changed the Creator subject, proper in ChatGPT’s outcomes.
That appeared good, however it in the end proved futile. After I closed the editor, it requested me if I needed to save lots of. I did. Then this unhelpful message confirmed up.
I by no means did get again to my unique session. I needed to submit my unique immediate once more, and let GPT-5 do its work a second time.
However wait. There’s extra. Let’s dig into my check outcomes…
1. Writing a WordPress plugin
This was my very first test of coding prowess for any AI. It is what gave me that first “the world is about to vary” feeling, and it was performed utilizing GPT-3.5.
Subsequent exams, utilizing the identical immediate however with completely different AI fashions, generated combined outcomes. Some AIs did nice, some did not. Some AIs, like these from Microsoft and Google, improved over time.
Additionally: How I test an AI chatbot’s coding ability – and you can, too
ChatGPT’s mannequin has been the gold customary for this check because the very starting. That makes the outcomes of GPT-5 all that rather more curious.
So, look, the precise coding with GPT-5 was partially profitable. GPT-5 generated a single block of code, which I pasted right into a file and was capable of run. It offered the requisite UI.
After I pasted within the check names, it dynamically up to date the road depend, though it described it as “Line to randomize” as a substitute of “Traces to randomize.”
However then, once I clicked Randomize, it did not. As an alternative, it redirected me to instruments.php. What?? ChatGPT has by no means had an issue with this check, whether or not GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or GPT-4o. You imply to inform me that OpenAI’s much-anticipated GPT-5 is failing proper out of the gate? Ouch.
I then gave GPT-5 this immediate.
After I click on randomize, I am taken to http://testsite.native/wp-admin/instruments.php. I don’t get a listing of randomized outcomes. Are you able to repair?
The consequence was a line to patch. I am not thrilled with that method as a result of it requires the person to dig by code and to make no errors changing a line.
So, I requested GPT-5 for a full plugin. It gave me the total textual content of the plugin to repeat and paste. This time, it labored.
This time, it did randomize the strains. When it encountered duplicates, it separated them from one another, because it was instructed. Lastly.
Additionally: I found 5 AI content detectors that can correctly identify AI text 100% of the time
I am sorry, OpenAI. I’ve to fail you on this check. You’d have handed if the one error was not utilizing the plural of “line” when applicable. However the truth that it gave me again a non-working plugin on the primary attempt is fail territory, even when the AI did ultimately make it work on the second attempt.
Regardless of the way you spin it, this can be a step again.
2. Rewriting a string perform
This second check is designed to rewrite a string perform to higher verify for {dollars} and cents. The unique code that GPT-5 was requested to rewrite didn’t permit for cents (it solely checked for integers).
GPT-5 did nice with this check. It did return a minimal consequence as a result of it did not do any error checking. It did not verify for non-string enter, further whitespace, hundreds separators, or foreign money symbols.
However that is not what I requested for. I informed it to rewrite a perform, which itself didn’t have any error checking. GPT-5 did precisely what I requested with no embellishment. I am sort of glad of that as a result of it would not know whether or not or not code previous to this routine already did that work.
GPT-5 handed this check.
3. Discovering an annoying bug
This check happened as a result of I used to be fighting a less-than-obvious bug in my code. With out going into the weeds about how the WordPress framework works, the plain reply shouldn’t be the precise reply.
You want some pretty arcane data about how WordPress filters move their info. This check has been a stumbling block for quite a lot of AI LLMs.
Additionally: Gen AI disillusionment looms, according to Gartner’s 2025 Hype Cycle report
GPT-5, nevertheless, like GPT-4 and GPT-4o earlier than it, did perceive the issue. It articulated a transparent answer.
GPT-5 handed this check.
4. Writing a script
This check asks the AI to include a reasonably obscure Mac scripting software known as Keyboard Maestro, in addition to Apple’s scripting language AppleScript, and Chrome scripting habits.
It is actually a check of the attain of the AI by way of data, its understanding of how internet pages are constructed, and the power to put in writing code throughout three interlinked environments.
Fairly just a few AIs have failed this check, however the failure level is often a lack of information about Keyboard Maestro. GPT-3.5 did not find out about Keyboard Maestro. However ChatGPT has been passing this check since GPT-4. Till now.
The place ought to we begin? Effectively, the excellent news is that GPT-5 dealt with the Keyboard Maestro a part of the issue simply nice. Nevertheless it obtained the coding so unsuitable that it even doubled down on its lack of expertise of how case works in AppleScript.
It truly invented a property. That is a kind of instances the place an AI confidently presents a solution that’s fully unsuitable.
Additionally: ChatGPT comes with personality presets now – and other upgrades you might have missed
AppleScript is natively case-insensitive. If you would like AppleScript to concentrate to case, it’s good to use a “contemplating case” block. So, this occurred.
The rationale the error message referred to the title of one in all my articles is as a result of that was the entrance window in Chrome. This perform checks the entrance window and does stuff based mostly on the title.
However misunderstanding how case works wasn’t the one AppleScript error GPT-5 generated. It additionally referenced a variable named searchTerm with out defining it. That is just about an error-creating follow in any programming language.
Fail, fail, fail, McFaildypants.
The web hath spoken
OpenAI appeared to undergo from the identical hubris that its AIs do. It confidently moved everybody to GPT-5 and burned the bridges again to GPT-4o. I am paying $200 a month for a ChatGPT Pro account. On Friday, I could not transfer again to GPT-4o for coding work. Neither might anybody else.
There was, nevertheless, only a tiny little bit of person pushback on the entire bridges burning factor. And by tiny, I imply the entire frickin’ internet. So, by Saturday, ChatGPT had a brand new choice.
To get to this, go to your ChatGPT settings and activate “Present legacy fashions.” Then, because it has all the time been, simply drop down the mannequin menu and select the one you need. Word: this feature is just accessible to these on paid tiers. Should you’re utilizing ChatGPT without cost, you may take what you are given, and you may adore it.
Ever because the entire generative AI factor kicked off firstly of 2023, ChatGPT has been the gold customary of programming instruments, no less than in line with my LLM testing.
Additionally: Microsoft rolls out GPT-5 across its Copilot suite – here’s where you’ll find it
Now? I am actually undecided. That is solely a day or so after GPT-5 has been launched, so its outcomes will most likely get higher over time. However for now, I am sticking with GPT-4o for coding, though I do just like the deep reasoning capabilities in GPT-5.
What about you? Have you ever tried GPT-5 for programming duties but? Did it carry out higher or worse than earlier variations like GPT-4o or GPT-3.5? Had been you capable of get working code on the primary attempt, or GPT-4o did it’s a must to information it by fixes? Are you going to make use of GPT-5 for coding or follow older fashions? Tell us within the feedback beneath.
You’ll be able to comply with my day-to-day challenge updates on social media. Remember to subscribe to my weekly update newsletter, and comply with me on Twitter/X at @DavidGewirtz, on Fb at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, on Bluesky at @DavidGewirtz.com, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.
